What more can be said?
Share this:
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
What an atrocity!!! One of the fruits of the Spirit is self control – something this woman lacks! I heard that she also did a belly flop. I have a clip of this in one of my videos but it is much shorter.
This is a great blog – I put it in my blogroll. Thank you.
LikeLike
I dont hear any blasphemy in the whole video… Truly blaspheming the Holy Spirit is to consciously and deliberately proclaim that the moving of the Spirit is the work of the devil and also to directly say that the Holy Spirit is an evil person and worker in the world… to a true christian this is basically laughable because if u are a christian then it is only by the Holy Spirit that you can truly call Jesus “Lord” and “King” which if you then turn around and blaspheme the Spirit, then you are either A) A very decieved person, B) a very decieving person C) a deliberate divider, well versed in the lying arts and premeditating how to bring corruption and division among people!… ok, so maybe thats a little hectic… but as for saying that you need a Holy Spirit enama is like saying you need a Holy spirit intravenous drip… the words are not damming in any way, perhaps poorly chosen but not blashemy… and as for losing control…. the Holy Spirit routinely makes people lose control of themselves in quite weird and odd ways… and the yes, one of the fruits of the spirit is self-control but that is control of the selfish/self-centred flesh nature that we all have and not control of the way we proclaim Gods message and deliver prophecy to people… and in relation to may people I have witnessed she is actually very composed… and one does get very out of breathe when shouting into a microphone…. just sayin!
LikeLike
Another example of people in the pentecostal/charismatic movement treating God the Holy Spirit as a thing or force, just like the cults, and not treating Him as the Creator, King, Omnipotent, Savior.
LikeLike
david:
“Whoever blasphemes the name of the LORD shall surely be put to death…” (Lev.24:16a).
Here the word for blasphemy is “נָקַב” (transliterated “naqab”), literally meaning to bore, pierce, or puncture. The meaning is of compromising or breaking the integrity of a seal (and thus allow contamination). The application is that blasphemy is any lessening or cheapening of the integrity of the personality, attributes or identity of the all-pure, all-holy Triune God. To associate anything unholy or impure with the name or person of God is to blasphemy Him. To speak of Him irreverently, jokingly, or flippantly, is blasphemy. And thus to refer to Him as an “enema” (someone to shove up your rectum) is gross blasphemy indeed.
LikeLike
David: You are right about this being blasphemy, but for a different reason than you’re saying.
I honestly didn’t know what an enema was, so I looked it up. It’s a liquid that empties out the bowels, or the procedure of doing that.
Not only is referring to the Holy Spirit as an enema disgusting, it is grossly inaccurate (no pun intended.) That is saying that once a person becomes redeemed, everything that was bad is purged out of you. If that were true, than Roman 7 is a lie, for it talks about Paul struggling with the flesh; the old self is dead, but still there. Trying to tell people that they couldn’t be Christians because not every single sin and sinful desire is gone – that’s a trick of the Accuser; a good one, too.
LikeLike
072591:
What we see a lot of today are people trying to make a point about spiritual matters, yet in the process crossing over into blasphemy in attempting to make their point (such as the need for a “Holy Ghost enema”). Perhaps her intended point was that we need God to purge out whatever is bad in us. Or perhaps it was as you pointed out, in which case as you rightly said, she was also in conflict with the Scriptures. At any rate, all intended teachings aside, what we are seeing is that in people’s attempts to be “relevant”, there is more and more laxness and flippancy in speaking of the things relating to the all-pure Almighty God and His word. We wouldn’t dare insult, joke about, or trifle with someone who held a gun to our heads, yet the Almighty God Who has the power to immediately cast us alive into eternal hellfire if He so chose to do so, is spoken about in a cavalier manner the likes of which we NEVER see in Scripture. And the whole meaning, much less the gravity, of blasphemy is widely treated as a non-issue. The fear of God is conspicuously missing.
LikeLike