That plain people should be confused and deluded is not surprising when we examine some of the statements made about the efficacy of baby baptism. Take for example the Reformers. Consider the familiar words of the Prayer Book Service for the Public Baptism of Infants:
Seeing now, dearly beloved brethren, that this child is regenerate . . . . We yield thee hearty thanks, most merciful Father, that it hath pleased thee to regenerate this baby with thy Holy Spirit, to receive him for thine own child by adoption, and to incorporate him into thy holy church.
Then in the Catechism, the question ‘Who gave you this name?’ is answered:
My Godfather and Godmother in my baptism; wherein I was made a member of Christ, the child of God, and an inheritor of the kingdom of heaven.
Now can it be denied that these words are misleading? Is not the natural and unforced meaning of these statements such as implies baptismal regeneration?
– T.E. Watson
Amen and amen! One good thing the Anabaptist died for was denial of infant baptism, recognizing it as unbiblical and damaging to the soul, and connected to the Roman cult desire to count sources of revenue.
LikeLike